1.)
Should we torture captives?
2.)
Should waterboarding be
allowed?
3.)
Is waterboarding
a reliable tactic to get information out of captives?
Obviously as an American I do believe that torture is unjust, but I also
do feel that there are certain occasions where there are exceptions. It’s not
like Special Forces are going around and waterboarding innocent civilians as
they please. They only use this tactic in special and extreme cases. These
terrorists or other people that are a major threat to our country put
themselves in the position to be forced for us to rely on other tactics to try
and get them to confess or give us information. So I do not think it is fair
for us as Americans and civilians to judge what the Special Forces do when
handling dangerous people because this isn’t an ordinary situation and they are
looking out for us and trying to protect us the best they can. People react
differently when in extreme conditions and situations, so if they think that
waterboarding is what is going to get the terrorists to cave in and confess
that by all means I stand behind them.
Although, this does bring the question up of is waterboarding a reliable
tactic to get information out of captives? As Hitchens says, “It may be a mean
of extracting information, but it is also a means of extracting junk
information. To put it briefly, even the C.I.A. sources for the Washington Post story on waterboarding conceded
that the information they got out of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was “not all of it
reliable.” He goes on to say how it gives you memory loss and people confess
things that do not even pertain to what they are asking…this being said, is it
worth the torture and time to rely on this form of getting people come out with
the answers to the questions they are asking?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like this perspective. Not to say that i don't agree with it but just to spark intelligent debate, what if you took out of the picture that you were from the US and the other guy was from Al-quaeda? Which side is superior with their morals? I think it raises an interesting question about the idea of torture. Is torture only ok if you are on the side that is executing it? It kind of goes with war as well. Which side is right? I guess it means no side is. Technically speaking, both countries are advocating strong deep-set values that define them as a sovereign entity. So, also technically speaking, they both are valid in doing what they think is right. It's not until you evaluate which argument of which side makes more sense to you and conforms to your personal ideas of what is right and wrong that you are able to choose a side. Interesting huh?
ReplyDeleteOh yah, i totally agree with you though. If we gotta waterboard them ,then we gotta waterboard them. Haha :)
Yeah I completley agree with your saying, If I was on Al-Quaeda's side than I would think that Americans were unjust for waterboarding people from my country. I think it's almost impossible to have two sides agree on this topic because in the end everyone is trying to preotect and stand up for their own country or where their from.
Delete